DNA barcoding Australia's fish species
Abstract
GC than sharks (44.7% versus 41.0%), again largely due to higher GC in the 3rd codon position in the former (36.3% versus 26.8%). Average within-species, genus, family, order and class Kimura two parameter (K2P) distances were 0.39%, 9.93%, 15.46%, 22.18% and 23.27%, respectively. All species could be differentiated by their cox1 sequence, although single individuals of each of two species had haplotypes characteristic of a congener. Although DNA barcoding aims to develop species identification systems, some phylogenetic signal was apparent in the data. In the neighbourjoining tree for all 754 sequences, four major clusters were apparent: chimaerids, rays, sharks and teleosts. Species within genera invariably clustered, and generally so did genera within families. Three taxonomic groups—dogfishes of the genus Squalus, flatheads of the family Platycephalidae, and tunas of the genus Thunnus—were examined more closely. The clades revealed after bootstrapping generally corresponded well with expectations. Individuals from operational taxonomic units designated as Squalus species B through F formed individual clades, supporting morphological evidence for each of these being separate species. We conclude that cox1 sequencing, or ‘barcoding’, can be used to identify fish species.
Cited in this thesis
Frequently Cited Together
- Identification of the Species of Origin for Meat Products by Rapid Evaporative I1 chapter
- Fishers' preference for mobile traceability platform: challenges in achieving a 1 chapter
- Automatic design of convolutional neural network architectures under resource co1 chapter
- Unlocking the combined impact of microplastics and emerging contaminants on fish1 chapter
- Microplastic contamination in wild freshwater fish: global trends, challenges an1 chapter
- Adaptive mixtures of local experts1 chapter
BibTeX
@article{Ward2005,
author = {Robert D. Ward and Tyler S. Zemlak and B. H. Innes and Paul D. N. Hebert},
journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B},
title = {DNA barcoding Australia's fish species},
year = {2005},
abstract = {GC than sharks (44.7% versus 41.0%), again largely due to higher GC in the 3rd codon position in the former (36.3% versus 26.8%). Average within-species, genus, family, order and class Kimura two parameter (K2P) distances were 0.39%, 9.93%, 15.46%, 22.18% and 23.27%, respectively. All species could be differentiated by their cox1 sequence, although single individuals of each of two species had haplotypes characteristic of a congener. Although DNA barcoding aims to develop species identification systems, some phylogenetic signal was apparent in the data. In the neighbourjoining tree for all 754 sequences, four major clusters were apparent: chimaerids, rays, sharks and teleosts. Species within genera invariably clustered, and generally so did genera within families. Three taxonomic groups—dogfishes of the genus Squalus, flatheads of the family Platycephalidae, and tunas of the genus Thunnus—were examined more closely. The clades revealed after bootstrapping generally corresponded well with expectations. Individuals from operational taxonomic units designated as Squalus species B through F formed individual clades, supporting morphological evidence for each of these being separate species. We conclude that cox1 sequencing, or ‘barcoding’, can be used to identify fish species.},
doi = {10.1098/rstb.2005.1716},
mag_id = {2171405751},
pmcid = {1609232},
pmid = {16214743},
}